Modal Sosial dan Pendampingan BUMDes Sebagai Solusi Recovery Economy Masyarakat Terdampak Tsunami Selat Sunda di Kabupaten Pandeglang
Abstract
SOCIAL CAPITAL AND ASSISTANCE FOR BUMDES AS ECONOMIC RECOVERY SOLUTIONS FOR COMMUNITIES AFFECTED BY THE SUNDA STRAIT TSUNAMI IN PANDEGLANG REGENCY. The presence of the Ministry of Villages, Development of Disadvantaged Regions and Transmigration is the implementing agent of Law no. 6 of 2014 concerning Villages, it is substantively expected to be able to build villages through structural and cultural approaches. Villages are expected to become independent economically, socially, culturally and politically. The method used in this community service activity is using the lecture method, discussion method, dialogue, and mentoring and practice methods, the material presented about good BUMDes management information is still lacking, this is indicated by a score of 47%., After the community is given education and assistance in the management of BUMDes as the goal of economic recovery after good results were obtained, which was 93%. These results need to be strengthened by improving the management of BUMDes, where academics and the government can collaborate on the best model (deliberative model) for the development of BUMDes to be efficient and competitive.
References
Azhari, F., & Mawardi, M. K. (2018). peran modal sosial dalam pengembangan jaringan usaha kecil menengah (studi kasus pada rumah makan padang ). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis (JAB, 59(1): 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Cahyono, B., & Adhiatma, A. (2016). Peran modal sosial dalam peningkatan kesejahteraan masyarakat petani tembakau di Kabupaten Wonosobo. Conference In Business, Accounting, And Management (CBAM): 1(1), 131–144.
Gerring, J. (2007). Case study research principles and practices. Cambridge University Press.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business a skill-building approach. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian manajemen (Setiyawami (ed.)). Alfabeta.
Yin. R. K. (2003). Case Study research : Design and method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bakornas, PB. 2007. Pengenalan karakteristik bencana dan upaya mitigasinya di Indonesia: Edisi II. Diakses melalui https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/ 20160303195458-20-115215/bnpbindonesia-kekurangan-sirene-dan-alatdeteksi-tsunami pada tanggal 18 Juni 2019.
Barakat, S (2003). Housing reconstruction after conflict and Disaster. Humanitarian Policy Group, Network Papers, No. 43, pp. 1-40.
Benson, C., & Clay, E.J. 2004. Understanding the economic and financial impact of natural disaster. Washington D.C.:Theworld bank.
Caballero, R. J. & M. L. Hammour, (1994). The cleansing effect of recessions, American Economic Review, 84: 1350-1368.
Coppola, D. P. (2006). Introduction to international disaster management, Butterworth Heinemann
Damayanti, P. (2010). Peran stakeholder dalam rehabilitasi dan rekonstruksi bencana gempa bumi di Pangalengan (Studi kasus: Dusun Margakawit). Undergraduate, Institut Teknologi Bandung
DetikNews. 2018. Update data korban Tsunami Selat Sunda: 281 Tewas, 1.016 Luka. Diakses melalui https://news.detik.com/berita/d- 4356766/update-data-korban-tsunamiselat-sunda-281-tewas-1016-luka pada tanggal 15 Juni 2019.
Gerring, J. 2007. Case study research: Principles and practises. Cambridge University Press.
Hantoro, W.S & Rezaldy, M.Y. (2015). Kerentanan dan ketahanan kawasan Selat Sunda. Pusat Penelitian Geoteknologi LIPI: Bandung.
Ingirige, B., Richard, H., Malalgoda, C. Palliyaguru, R. (2008). Exploring good practice knowledge transfer related to post-tsunami housing (Re-) construction in Sri Lanka. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 13: 21-42.
Lassa, J. A. (2011). Institutional vulnerability and governance of disaster risk reduction: Macro, meso-and micro scale assessment. Universitäts-und Landesbibliothek Bonn.
