Technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge: Merancang Pembelajaran Matematika yang Powerful
Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge: Designing Powerful Math Learning
Abstract
Tujuan pengabdian ini adalah untuk memberikan pelatihan dan workshop perancangan pembelajaran matematika bagi guru sekolah dasar dengan fokus pada integrasi Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge (TPACK). TPACK merupakan pengetahuan profesionalisme guru yang penting untuk mengintegrasikan teknologi dalam pembelajaran, membantu guru merancang pembelajaran yang efektif dan efisien, mulai dari penyusunan skenario, skema alur, perangkat, praktik, hingga evaluasi dan refleksi pembelajaran. Metode pengabdian ini melibatkan pelatihan dan workshop yang diselenggarakan dalam bentuk seminar, pelatihan, pendampingan, Focus Group Discussion, dan simulasi. Kegiatan ini diikuti oleh 30 peserta yang merupakan guru inti dari seluruh Sekolah Dasar Negeri di wilayah Kecamatan Cisayong Kabupaten Tasikmalaya. Kegiatan dilaksanakan mulai tanggal 29 Juli hingga 19 Agustus 2023, bertempat di SD Negeri Inpres Cigorowong. Hasil pengabdian menunjukkan bahwa peserta dapat menyusun skenario, skema alur, serta perangkat pembelajaran berbasis TPACK, termasuk RPP, bahan ajar, LKPD, media berbasis Applet Geogebra, dan instrumen evaluasi. Diskusi dari hasil pengabdian ini menunjukkan bahwa pelatihan dan workshop ini efektif dalam meningkatkan pemahaman dan keterampilan guru dalam merancang pembelajaran matematika yang terintegrasi dengan teknologi. Implementasi dari hasil pengabdian ini diharapkan dapat meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran matematika di sekolah dasar, memperkuat peran TPACK dalam pengajaran, dan memberikan dampak positif pada proses pembelajaran dan prestasi siswa.
The purpose of this study is to provide training and workshops on designing mathematics teaching for elementary school teachers with a focus on integrating Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge (TPACK). TPACK is a crucial aspect of teachers' professionalism, enabling the integration of technology into teaching, assisting teachers in designing effective and efficient teaching, ranging from the development of teaching scenarios, lesson flow schemes, teaching tools, teaching practices, to evaluation and reflection on teaching. The research methodology involves training and workshops conducted in the form of seminars, training sessions, mentoring, Focus Group Discussions, and simulations. This activity is attended by 30 participants who are core teachers from all public elementary schools in the Cisayong District, Tasikmalaya Regency. The activity takes place from July 29 to August 19, 2023, at SD Negeri Inpres Cigorowong. The research findings indicate that participants are able to formulate teaching scenarios, lesson flow schemes, and TPACK-based teaching tools, including lesson plans, teaching materials, worksheets, Applet Geogebra-based media, and evaluation instruments. Discussion of the research results indicates that these training and workshops are effective in enhancing teachers' understanding and skills in designing technology-integrated mathematics teaching. The implementation of these research findings is expected to enhance the quality of mathematics teaching in elementary schools, strengthen the role of TPACK in teaching, and have a positive impact on the teaching process and students' achievement.
References
Aliustaoğlu, F., & Tuna, A. (2021). Examining the pedagogical content knowledge of prospective mathematics teachers on the subject of limits. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 52(6), 833–856. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1703148
Archambault, L. M., & Barnett, J. H. (2010). Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring the TPACK framework. Computers and Education, 55(4), 1656–1662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.009
Ay, Y., Karadag, E., & Acat, M. B. (2015). The Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge-practical (TPACK-Practical) model: Examination of its validity in the Turkish culture via structural equation modeling. Computers and Education, 88, 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.04.017
Baya’a, N., & Daher, W. (2015). The Development of college instructors’ technological pedagogical and content knowledge. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 1166–1175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.733
Dwijayanti, N., Suharta, I. G. P., & Sariyasa. (2017). Bruner’s cognitive stages and their effects on the understanding of fraction concept. International Research Journal of Engineering, IT and Scientific Research, 3(4), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjeis.v3i4.497
Erdogan, A., & Sahin, I. (2010). Relationship between math teacher candidates’ Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) and achievement levels. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2707–2711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.400
Fahma, M. A., & Purwaningrum, J. P. (2021). Teori Piaget dalam pembelajaran matematika. MUST: Journal of Mathematics Education, Science and Technology, 6(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.30651/must.v6i1.6966
Haji, S. (2013). Pendekatan iceberg dalam pembelajaran pembagian pecahan di sekolah dasar. Infinity Journal, 2(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v2i1.26
Hassan, A. K., Hammadi, S. S., & Majeed, B. H. (2023). The impact of a scenario-based learning model in mathematics achievement and mental motivation for high school students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(7), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i07.39263
Joan, R. (2013). Flexible learning as new learning design in classroom process to promote quality education. I-Manager’s Journal on School Educational Technology, 9(1), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.9.1.2401
Kim, S. (2018). Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge (TPACK) and beliefs of preservice secondary mathematics teachers: Examining the relationships. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(10), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/93179
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers & Education, 49, 740–762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.012
Koh, J. H. L., & Chai, C. S. (2016). Seven design frames that teachers use when considering Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). Computers and Education, 102, 244–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.09.003
Kramarski, B., & Michalsky, T. (2010). Preparing preservice teachers for self-regulated learning in the context of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 20(5), 434–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.05.003
Kurniasih, R. (2017). Penerapan strategi pembelajaran fase belajar model Van Hiele pada materi bangun ruang sisi datar di SMP Islam Al-Azhaar Tulungagung. Jurnal Silogisme: Kajian Ilmu Matematika Dan Pembelajarannya, 2(2), 61–68.
Loong, E. Y. K., & Herbert, S. (2018). Primary school teachers’ use of digital technology in mathematics: the complexities. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 30(4), 475–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-018-0235-9
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810610800610
Ramli, M., Widoretno, S., Dwiastuti, S., Sugiharto, B., Prayitno, B. A., Mumpuni, K. E., Prabowo, C. A., Auliananda, S. S., Basuki, Z. A. Y., & Ciptaningrum, P. A. (2023). Peningkatan Pemahaman Penyusunan RPP dan Asesmen Berbasis Learning Progression bagi Guru Biologi. Jurnal Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat, 8(2), 338–349. https://doi.org/10.30653/jppm.v8i2.357
Rikayanti, R., Abadi, A. P., Dewi, I. R., & Adham, M. J. I. (2023). Penyusunan bahan ajar matematika berbasis IT (Edmodo-QR code, Cabry 3D, dan screen shoots O Matic) untuk guru SMK se-Kabupaten Karawang. Jurnal Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat, 9(1), 257–265. https://doi.org/10.30653/jppm.v9i1.793
Santos, J. M., & Castro, R. D. R. (2021). Technological Pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: Application of learning in the classroom by pre-service teachers (PST). Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3(1), 100110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100110
Sartika, N. S., Munawaroh, T., Susanti, E. N., Meika, I., Mauladaniyati, R., Sujana, A., Sahrudin, A., Yunitasari, I., Rosdianwinata, E., Rifai, R., Pratidiana, D., Permatasari, P., Uniah, D., & Cahyati, K. (2023). Pelatihan penyusunan bahan ajar berbasis web bagi guru SMP Kabupaten Pandeglang. Jurnal Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat, 8(4), 934–945. https://doi.org/10.30653/jppm.v8i4.621
Shahhida, N., Bakar, A., Maat, S. M., & Rosli, R. (2020). Mathematics teacher’s self -efficacy of technology integration and technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(2), 259–276. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.2.10818.259-276
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand knowledge: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.2307/1175860
Sutamrin, Rosidah, & Zaki, A. (2022). The Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) of prospective teachers. EduLine: Journal of Education and Learning Innovation, 2(4), 399–405. https://doi.org/10.35877/454ri.eduline1291
Tootell, H., Freeman, M., & Freeman, A. (2014). Generation alpha at the intersection of technology, play and motivation. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.19
Uçar, M. B., Demir, C., & Hiğde, E. (2014). Exploring the self-confidence of preservice science and physics teachers towards technological pedagogical content knowledge. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3381–3384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.768
Urban, E. R., Navarro, M., & Borron, A. (2018). TPACK to GPACK? The examination of the technological pedagogical content knowledge framework as a model for global integration into college of agriculture classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 73, 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.03.013
